Why Rolling Stone Magazine Should’ve Gone With Any of These Covers

Rolling Stone magazine rolled out a cover for their August 2013 issue that’s been quite controversial over the past week and a half. The cover has been met with outrage and disappointment with Rolling Stone’s insensitive decision to blatantly showcase one of the Boston bombers (I will not refer to him by name) on the cover and tell his “story.” He’s being glamorized and people don’t like it.

We live in America where in no other country in the world are we afforded such God-given freedoms like freedom of speech. Rolling Stone has every right to print whatever they want on their covers. Rolling Stone magazine is not a person: it’s a corporation (contrary to what’s been said before). It’s an unfeeling, corporate, money-driven entity who’s sole purpose is to generate lots of revenue, no matter what the cost. Feelings have nothing to do with it. You may not like it, I certainly don’t, but it’s just the way it is.

However, the people running the machine could’ve shown a little compassion. They could’ve shown a little sensitivity. Where is their moral center? Where does common sense reside in the editor’s room? In a dark, musty corner long forgotten and discarded? They took the easy way and shirked any responsibility to its readers, the fine people of Boston and most importantly, the victims.

In my opinion, these four individuals have a much better story than what Rolling Stone dredged up. As I looked for their identities and for their pictures, I was moved by their stories. They were sons and daughters leading rich lives with so much promise.

Krystle always had a smile on her face despite the long hours at work as a dining room manager and dedicated her time to take care of her sick grandmother, taking two years in the process to do so. Lingzi was a statistics student from China working on her masters degree while living in Boston, a city she loved so much. Sweet little Martin was a typical young boy who was so full of life, loved hockey, loved school and had a loving family surrounding him. And Sean, the MIT police officer who was callously ambushed by the bomber that Rolling Stone callously glorified, was a big Boston sports fan and loved racing.

ANY of these worthwhile and fantastic human beings would’ve made a greater story and cover for the August 2013 issue. Tired of seeing the current cover on news racks, television, and online, I decided to make my own from scratch instead:

Rolling Stone_Martin Richard

Photo: Martin Family

Rolling Stone_Krystal Campbell

Photo: Steve Sullivan

Rolling Stone_Lingzi Lu

Photo: Collier Family

Photo: Collier Family

Martin Richard, Krystle Campbell, Lingzi Lu and Sean Collier. Remember their names and honor them.

Cover Art

Advertisements

7 responses to “Why Rolling Stone Magazine Should’ve Gone With Any of These Covers

  1. Pingback: Photo Challenge: Cover Art | tnkerr-Writing Prompts and Practice·

  2. Pingback: Cover Art #dpchallenge #photography | Moondustwriter's Blog·

  3. Pingback: Grungy Cover Art | Flying On Empty Thoughts·

  4. Just came across this while browsing after the monster’s verdict was read. Yes RS made a bad a tasteless and cruel decision. With the UVA story, guess its a habit with them. Thanks for showing examples of what they should have done for this and reminding me of the ambushed police officer, whose murder does not get its due of public recognition

Would LOVE to read your comments but please forgive me if I'm unable to respond at times...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s